Can we see the signal?
If bladder filling produces a repeatable body-surface signature, candidate sensors and models should detect it above motion, posture, and coupling noise.
Illustrative hypothesis, not measured DryNight output.
A bladder-state sensing concept for bedwetting
DryNight is exploring whether a lower-abdomen wearable could estimate bladder filling overnight and support a private cue before wetness begins.
Pre-prototype. No DryNight sensor data. Not clinically validated or FDA-cleared.
The physical system is still a design direction. Stage 0 is the non-human bench feasibility phase that will determine the sensing modality, body interface, electronics, and whether this form factor is worth pursuing.
A scoping diagram, not an engineering specification
Body interface
A repeatable bench fixture before any on-body work.
Open decision
Ultrasound, bioimpedance, or another noninvasive approach selected by evidence.
Acquisition
Raw signal capture, known test conditions, local processing, and timestamped logs.
Connectivity
A proposed link to the cue endpoint with observable delivery and failure states.
Proposed child endpoint
A private haptic cue band. Cue effectiveness is a separate human-factors question after sensing feasibility.
Proposed caregiver endpoint
Optional escalation by family plan. No notification logic is claimed or implemented.
Candidate sensing, processing, and power architecture.
A proposed coupling layer designed around stable contact and comfort.
A proposed child-first haptic cue before optional caregiver escalation.
A proposed home base for charging and device handoff.
The film shows the current product direction: sense first, cue the wearer privately, and involve a caregiver only by plan. It is a design study, not a demonstration of working hardware.
If bladder filling produces a repeatable body-surface signature, candidate sensors and models should detect it above motion, posture, and coupling noise.
Illustrative hypothesis, not measured DryNight output.
If a discreet cue is delivered at a useful time, can it help a sleeping child wake without unacceptable sleep disruption or caregiver burden?
Illustrative sequence. Cue effectiveness has not been tested.
The next milestone
Compare candidate modalities under controlled fill, placement, motion, and coupling conditions.
Decision gate: Stop if no repeatable bladder-related signal is detectable above noise.
Test contact stability, positioning, materials, power, and thermal constraints on bench fixtures.
Decision gate: Redirect if stable coupling or practical packaging is not credible.
Review the bench data and decide whether to build a body-worn prototype, change modality, or stop.
Decision gate: Advance only if the evidence supports the next experiment.
“A child should not have to be wet before the system understands that help is needed.”